Feed manufacturers turn to alternatives of heat treatment on rising energy costs

Keyword:
Publish time:7/30/2008 12:00:00 AM      Source: www.cnchemicals.com
Information collection and data processing:  CCM     For more information, please contact us
July 30, 2008
Feed manufacturers turn to alternatives of heat treatment on rising energy costs
Press Release

Increasing legislation and rising energy costs are forcing feed manufacturers to focus on implementing viable, cost-effective alternatives to heat-treatment in order to reduce the risk of Salmonella infection in their products, according to Anitox, a company involved in biosecurity and milling efficiency solutions for the animal feed industry.

Commenting on the response of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Panel on Biological Hazards to a recent question from the Health and Consumer Protection, General Directorate, European Commission, Anitox Regional Director for Europe, Middle East and Africa, Roger Mann said, "Increasing legislation such as the ''Control of Salmonella and Other Specified Food Borne Zoonotic Agents Regulation (2160/2003)'' requires all livestock producers to implement procedures ensure feeds are free from Salmonella, which is driving a major focus on safety throughout the food chain. Doing so economically has become a major issue.

"EFSA''s response highlights the potential for pathogen contamination in feed. With the global feed and food industries watching closely what happens in Europe, feed manufacturers and livestock producers must appreciate the importance of producing pathogen-free feed, be fully aware of the microbiological status of their products and consider plans to manage this requirement cost-effectively.

"Although numerous compounds are available to control Salmonella and other undesirable micro-organisms in feed, their usability and efficiency varies widely. The EFSA''s response points out that a formaldehyde-based feed treatment provides a viable alternative to heat treatment in treating feed initially and preventing recontamination. Work by the Veterinary Laboratories Agency has also underlined the large differences in efficacy between different feed treatments in terms of their ability to mask the presence of Salmonella.''''

Mark Meynell, an independent feed industry consultant, said, "Rising energy costs have dramatically increased the cost of heat treatment processes, rendering them uneconomic in many situations. A typical plant to treat meal at the rate of 10 tonnes per hour, 20,000 tonnes per annum, would cost more than GBP 300,000 to install, equivalent to GBP 1.52 per tonne treated over a 10-year period. In addition, the manufacturer would face ongoing costs of GBP 0.58 per tonne for electricity, GBP 1.25 per tonne for steam and GBP 0.25 per tonne for repairs, taking the total to GBP 3.64 per tonne of feed treated over a 10-year period."

Anitox produces antimicrobial preservatives for animal feeds, feed ingredients, and foodstuffs for human consumption.